We share executive moves, placement insights, and Software and SaaS PE leadership trends weekly — feel free to follow us on LinkedIn here:
In the fast-paced world of private equity, there's no luxury of time for beautifully crafted resumes that say little about actual performance. When you're evaluating executive candidates for portfolio companies, especially in the SaaS space, you need concrete evidence of impact, and you need it fast.
The challenge isn't finding candidates with impressive backgrounds; it's distinguishing between those who can drive real value creation and those who simply excel at presenting themselves well. After years of assessing executive talent in private equity-backed companies, I've found that candidates that apply the SMART framework to major achievements on their resume cut through the noise and reveal true performance potential.
The SMART Framework for Executive Assessment
1. Specific
What were they actually responsible for?
Vague claims about "leading initiatives" or "driving growth" tell us nothing. I need to understand their exact role, scope of responsibility, and what specific actions they took.
2. Measurable
Can they point to concrete metrics rather than just compelling stories?
Numbers don't lie, and in software and SaaS businesses, everything meaningful can and should be quantified.
3. Achievable
Was the reported success meaningful and grounded in reality?
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and context matters enormously.
4. Relevant
Did their work actually move the needle on metrics that matter for value creation?
In SaaS, this typically means impact on churn, Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR), Net Revenue Retention (NRR), Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), or other key performance indicators.
5. Time-bound
Was there urgency, pressure, or a defined execution window?
The best executives thrive under constraints and can deliver results within realistic timeframes.
Using this framework cuts through the noise and points out the true difference-makers and value creators.
The Difference Between Passengers and Builders
Consider these two ways an executive might describe the same experience:
The Passenger Version:
"I improved customer retention through enhanced onboarding processes."
The Builder Version:
"We reduced SMB churn by 6.8% over 5 months by launching a standardized onboarding playbook and automating early-stage customer success touchpoints—ultimately saving $4.2M in ARR."
In private equity-backed SaaS companies, every executive hire is fundamentally a bet on future cash flows and value creation.
You can't afford passengers—executives who look good on paper but lack concrete impact. Whether you're evaluating a C-suite Executive or Vice President, the SMART framework helps identify candidates who understand that the highest-returning companies are led by executives who can point to specific, measurable improvements in customer acquisition, retention, expansion, and operational efficiency.
The Bottom Line
Pedigree matters far less than performance in private equity.
The executive who increased enterprise NRR by 15% at a Series B startup is infinitely more valuable than someone with a perfect resume who can't articulate concrete achievements.
When evaluating candidates, listen for specificity, probe for metrics, and pay attention to how they describe personal versus team contributions. The executives who can seamlessly provide SMART examples think in terms of business impact rather than activity, and these are the leaders who will drive value creation in your portfolio companies.
Bespoke Partners Named in Top 10 of the “Top 49 Retained Executive Search” 2-Years Running by C-Suite CV Secure.
Authored by:
Share this article: